Paul Adams, Chief Associate
Paul Adams, litigation expert, is among the best "Pro Se Litigators" in the State. He has been educating clients with their pro se legal educational needs for 14 years. In 2015, Mr. Adams graduated from Blackstone's Paralegal Certificate Program with Distinction. He has also been hands-on in over 400 cases that involves a wide variety of exemplary writs for others, and more than 15 Actions for himself, with hundreds of Complaints to:
- F.B.I Criminal Complaints;
- Office of Internal Affairs Complaints and Reports;
- United Nations Complaints and Reports;
- Letters and Complaints to Former United States President Barack Obama;
- U.S. Department of Justice Complaints via Commission on Judicial Performance (against State Judges);
- Federal Judicial Complaints and Motions for Disqualification of Federal and Magistrate Judges that exceed their Judicial Authority;
- And Many Others
Mr. Adams has over 45 published legal opinions in LexisNexis in Federal Courts. The following list comprises just a few:
- Paul Adams v. Raske, et al., U.S. District Court No: 3:11-cv-00243-WQH-JMA (S.D. Cal. 2013)
- Paul Adams v. Small, et al., U.S. District Court No.: 3:10-cv-01211-MMA (POR) (S.D. Cal. 2012)
- Paul Adams v. Dr. Arab, et al., U.S. Court of Appeals No.: 14-56930
- Paul Adams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., Case No.: 5:15-cv-01067-STO-PJW
- Paul Adams v. California Correctional Institution, U.S. Court No: EDCV 16-1678-AB
- Paul Adams v. Micheal Gottlieb, et al., U.S. District Court No.: 2:2007-cv-06820
- Paul Adams v. Gavin Newsom, et al., U.S. District Court No.:
- Paul Adams v. CDCR, U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals No.: 16-56224
- Paul Adams v. Sullivan, Habeas Corpus, State Courts: Numerous complaints, which may be found by looking up Paul Adams F-92755 (CDCR#) and case numbers LAO53553; LAOVA146073
Why work with The Last Chance Project and Paul Adams?
The reason 40+ published opinions have been established in Paul Adams’ name is because of the method of litigation used: the argument, or the issues involved had not been raised – meaning that the matter generated by Mr. Adams was original and thus, law manifested from the issues. This means that Mr. Adams develops new insights and creates original arguments. For this reason, your opportunity to develop a ground and argue an extraordinary issue adds to the chances of your ability to succeed in the legal challenges that relate to the facts and evidence of your case. Bottom line is that you may have a much higher chance of your case being accepted back into the courts and heard, which can then ultimately lead to the justice you and your loved ones deserve.
- Paul Adams has filed and litigated many cases while representing himself, has taken one case in Paul Adams v. Dr. Arab to United States Federal District Trial, lost the trial, and then successfully made a satisfactory settlement in the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals based upon the Defendants misconduct at trial.
- Paul Adams has acted pro per (represented himself) in one of his criminal cases for first degree residential burglary, facing the maximum exposure of 36 years-to-life in prison. After litigating the case as pro se (Latin for "in one's own behalf") for 10 months, he resolved the case in a plea deal for 44 months, which was basically time served.
- Paul Adams has educated other inmates to defeat many time-barred problems in habeas proceedings and has educated others with achieving adequate results for some of the habeas corpus cases they have filed. In the case of Michael Valenzuela, with second-degree murder, Mr. Adams educated him and the result got him reversed in conviction, he plead guilty to manslaughter in the first degree and his sentence was changed from 25 years-to-life to 11 years with 7 years already served. Mr. Valenzuela was time-barred and a “Gate-way” claim was raised as to illegal conviction/sentence with ineffective assistance of counsel sprinkled in. Pursuant to Jackson v. Virginia.
- Paul Adams educated an inmate, Wade Hollis Harris who succeed in bringing his legal habeas corpus and his federal lawsuits in the courts when they were deemed to be past the time-bar(s) (not allowed back in to the courts to be heard).
The reason 40+ published opinions have been established in Paul Adams’ name is because of the method of litigation used: the argument, or the issues involved had not been raised – meaning that the matter generated by Mr. Adams was original and thus, law manifested from the issues. This means that Mr. Adams develops new insights and creates original arguments. For this reason, your opportunity to develop a ground and argue an extraordinary issue adds to the chances of your ability to succeed in the legal challenges that relate to the facts and evidence of your case. Bottom line is that you may have a much higher chance of your case being accepted back into the courts and heard, which can then ultimately lead to the justice you and your loved ones deserve.
Please click the Contact TLCP button to send us a message and let us know
how we can help you or your loved one get justice.
how we can help you or your loved one get justice.
Please be advised that as agents of TLCP we are not licensed to practice law and are not authorized to provide legal advice. We do not and cannot give legal advice or provide legal representation at any level in any manner. Nothing in this website constitutes, or is meant to constitute, advice of any kind. We are not a law firm.
Important Note
The Last Chance Project LLC ("TLCP") cannot give legal advice or provide legal representation in court. TLCP is not a law firm or a substitute for an attorney. Services provided are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The primary purpose (among others) of the services provided by TLCP are to assist you in preparing your documents for filing as Pro Se (representing yourself).
If an attorney is needed in your legal matter, TLCP recommends you contact your local bar association. TLCP prides itself with providing assistance, but TLCP cannot and does not guarantee the outcome of any matter educated on.
Important Note
The Last Chance Project LLC ("TLCP") cannot give legal advice or provide legal representation in court. TLCP is not a law firm or a substitute for an attorney. Services provided are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The primary purpose (among others) of the services provided by TLCP are to assist you in preparing your documents for filing as Pro Se (representing yourself).
If an attorney is needed in your legal matter, TLCP recommends you contact your local bar association. TLCP prides itself with providing assistance, but TLCP cannot and does not guarantee the outcome of any matter educated on.